Mysteries, Fiction, Non-Fiction, Memoirs, Literary Novels, Humor....all kinds of books.
Monday, June 1, 2020
Review of "The Republican Brain: The Science of Why They Deny Science - and Reality" by Chris Mooney
Before reading this book I could not comprehend how some people, usually conservative Republicans, could deny things like global warming.....
…..and evolution - which (in my view) have been unquestionably proven by science.
I also found it bewildering that - in the face of proof to the contrary - some folks insist that President Obama was born in Kenya, that he's a Muslim, and so on.
I thought these folks were willfully deluding themselves, pretending not to believe (just to be contrary....ha ha ha), or perhaps they weren't too bright.
In this book, Chris Mooney makes it pretty clear that none of the above is true. Rather, the brains of conservative people are wired in a way that makes it impossible for them to accept ideas that they find 'threatening.' Thus, if conservatives are presented with information contrary to their core beliefs, they either 'don't hear it', 'deny it', or 'change the goalposts'....that is, shift their perspective to make the new information tolerable.
In a nutshell, that's the basic premise of Mooney's book.
To be fair, Mooney notes that liberals have biases as well. He asserts, however, that liberals seem more able to change their minds when evidence is presented that's contrary to their ingrained notions. (I can attest to this from personal experience - with regard to the safety of nuclear power plants.)
One example of 'changing the goalposts' - not directly related to politics - is particularly striking. A doomsday cult called the Seekers, led by Dorothy Martin, believed they communicated with aliens via Dorothy's automatic writing.
Dorothy Martin led a doomsday cult
The aliens said that the Earth would be destroyed on December 21, 1954, so the cult members divested themselves of their possessions and waited to be rescued by flying saucers.
Doomsday Cult
Of course the world didn't end and the cult members didn't go anywhere.
One might think the Seekers would HAVE to admit they'd been deluded or defrauded, Right? Nope! Dorothy Martin got another message via automatic writing declaring that the Seekers' beliefs had saved the world. Contrary to what would seem like common sense, the Seekers doubled down on their doctrine and became even more fanatic (though a good deal poorer....LOL).
Mooney includes information about the structure and evolution of the brain - as well as sociological, psychological, and scientific studies and surveys - to bolster his arguments.
On the down side, Mooney tends to repeat the same conclusions again and again, and the book could probably have been condensed into a comprehensive magazine article.
In any case, this is an interesting book that's worth reading. I feel it's given me a better understanding of why a group of people cling to controversial (and wrong in my opinion) convictions.
Rating: 3 stars
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Is he serious? Or is this intended to be a comical coffee table book? Nothing he says is accurate. An example of bias, pandering to the Left. Author started with a conclusion and then distorted data and events to support it (from none other than very liberal NPR & MSNBC). He mentions Conservapedia... not something I ever look at as it is only one aspect of the belief. Would have been an interesting book had the author adhered to scientific research principles and ethics. He says "conservatism supports political and social stability (true) and resisting change (false) and he is "tracing some of the appeal of this philosophy to psychology." I wonder what are his qualifications as a psychologist. I am not looking for arguments. I'm just stressing that so much of his assumptions are wrong. I think arguing about the Christian religion is pointless because there are so many different variations, just as there are so many different people. He also assumes that all Republicans are Christians. Not so, just as all Christians are Republicans...not so either. So many of his assumptions are in error, from my viewpoint.
ReplyDeleteThe author, Chris Mooney, is perfectly serious LeAnne, but obviously he has his personal point of view. He does cite research findings and the like. Still, I'm sure lots of people disagree with him.
Delete